Federal Circuit· 11/12/1996
In Re Ben Huang
Citations
- 100 F.3d 135
- 40 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1685
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 29467
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Once a prima facie case of obviousness has been established, the burden shifts to the applicant to come forward with evidence of nonobviousness to overcome the prima facie case.”
- evidence of commercial success “is relevant in the obviousness context only if there is proof that the sales were a direct result of the unique characteristics of the claimed invention”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Newman, Plager, Clevenger
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Cross Medical Products, Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2005-09-30· cited 260×
- Wyers v. Master Lock Co.Federal Circuit· 2010-07-22· cited 165×
- In Re Denis Rouffet, Yannick Tanguy and Frederic BerthaultFederal Circuit· 1998-07-15· cited 127×
- Winner International Royalty Corporation v. Ching-Rong WangFederal Circuit· 2000-03-06· cited 124×
- Iron Grip Barbell Company, Inc., and York Barbell Company, Inc. v. USA Sports, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2005-02-10· cited 113×
- In Re DBCFederal Circuit· 2008-11-03· cited 74×
- In Re Applied Materials, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2012-08-29· cited 73×
- Galderma Laboratories, L.P. v. Tolmar, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2013-12-11· cited 64×
- Syntex (u.s.a.) LLC and Allergan, Inc. v. Apotex, Inc., Apotex Corp., and Novex PharmaFederal Circuit· 2005-06-13· cited 50×
- Sightsound Technologies, LLC v. Apple Inc.Federal Circuit· 2015-12-15· cited 50×
- Novo Nordisk A/S v. Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd.Federal Circuit· 2013-06-18· cited 42×
- Western Union Co. v. MoneyGram Payment Systems, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2010-12-07· cited 39×
- Richard Ruiz and Foundation Anchoring Systems, Inc. v. A.B. Chance CompanyFederal Circuit· 2004-01-29· cited 31×
- In Re: Cree, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2016-03-21· cited 30×
- PPC Broadband, Inc. v. Corning Optical Communications RF, LLCFederal Circuit· 2016-02-22· cited 26×
- In Re Inland Steel CompanyFederal Circuit· 2001-09-19· cited 14×
- Eli Lilly & Co. v. Zenith Goldline Pharmaceuticals, Inc.S.D. Indiana· 2005-04-14· cited 14×
- In Re: BrandtFederal Circuit· 2018-03-27· cited 12×
- In Re Kenneth Harris and Jacqueline B. WahlFederal Circuit· 2005-06-30· cited 11×
- Abt Systems, LLC v. Emerson Electric Co.Federal Circuit· 2015-08-19· cited 11×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court· 1966-02-21· cited 3,371×
- Cable Electric Products, Inc. v. Genmark, Inc., A/K/A Diablo Products Corp.Federal Circuit· 1985-08-09· cited 176×
- Miles Laboratories, Inc. And Triangle Biomedical Equipment, Inc., Plaintiffs/cross-Appellants v. Shandon Inc. And Shandon Southern Products LimitedFederal Circuit· 1993-09-01· cited 152×
- Pro-Mold and Tool Company, Inc. v. Great Lakes Plastics, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantFederal Circuit· 1996-02-07· cited 135×
- Kansas Jack, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Charles J. Kuhn and Kuhn Manufacturing Company, Inc., Appellees/cross-AppellantsFederal Circuit· 1983-10-12· cited 115×
- In Re Howard SernakerFederal Circuit· 1983-02-28· cited 95×
- In Re Baxter Travenol LabsFederal Circuit· 1991-12-30· cited 89×
- In Re Richard E. WoodruffFederal Circuit· 1990-11-20· cited 75×
- In re AllerCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1955-03-22· cited 52×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.