In Re DBC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the Supreme Court never stated that Appointments Clause challenges must be heard regardless of waiver
• stating that addressing an issue not raised below is \an exceptional measure\ appropriate only in \rare cases\
• noting that a purpose of the waiver doctrine is to discourage disregard of agency procedures by giving the agency an opportunity to correct its own mistakes
• explaining that an employee’s declaration reciting personal knowledge of the subject content was sufficient
• rejecting a newly discovered Appointments Clause argument raised for the first time on judicial review because the party failed to raise it first before the administrative board
• finding no nexus absent evidence that \the driving force behind [the allegedly successful product's sales] was the [claimed invention]\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).