Skip to main content

In Re Bell

Citations

  • 91 S.W.3d 784
  • 45 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 336
  • 2002 Tex. LEXIS 8
  • 2002 WL 87074

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • courts should presume that words excluded from statute have been excluded purposefully and should not insert words into statute except to give effect to clear legislative intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Neill, Phillips, Hecht, Enoch, Owen, Jefferson, Rodriguez, Baker, Hankinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

84 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.