Hotze v. City of Houston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that purpose of promulgating Act was to prevent “one disgruntled taxpayer” from stopping “the entire bond issue by simply filing suit”
• explaining that EDJA was designed to prevent “one disgruntled taxpayer” from stopping “the entire bond issue by simply filing suit”
• explaining that purpose of promulgating EDJA was to prevent “one disgruntled taxpayer” from stopping “the entire bond issue by simply filing suit”
• observing that EDJA’s predecessor was enacted to “stop the age old practice [of] allowing one disgruntled taxpayer to stop the entire bond issue simply by filing suit”
• in reliance on section 1205.105(c), dismissing appeals under chapter 1205 for failure to post bond within ten days of trial court’s order setting bond
• “The Legislature enacted the EDJA to provide issuers of public securities . . . a method of quickly and efficiently adjudicating the validity of public securities and acts affecting those public securities.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).