Skip to main content

In Re Bell

Citations

  • 344 S.W.3d 304
  • 2011 Tenn. LEXIS 577
  • 2011 WL 2304191

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “ ‘A judge is in no way disqualified because he tried and made certain findings in previous litigation,’ and ‘the mere fact that a judge has ruled adversely to a party or witness in prior judicial proceedings is not grounds for recusal.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chief Justice Cornelia A. Clark

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.