Danielle Malmquist v. Shem Malmquist

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because an ordered obligation was ongoing, “the trial court had broad authority to punish a party for violating it at anytime those violations were brought before the court”
• concluding that a trial judge was not required to recuse himself from a case when a threat allegedly made by one of the litigants was communicated to the trial judge through a third party while the case was on appeal
• upholding trial judge’s denial of motion to recuse because “the record does not indicate any bias on the part of” the trial judge
• “A judge‟s decision to grant a recusal is within his or her discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).