District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 12/27/1993
In Re Barlow
Citations
- 634 A.2d 1246
- 1993 D.C. App. LEXIS 315
- 1993 WL 538274
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- deciding appeal that was technically moot, because of “short duration” of challenged action and because appeal involved “overarching issues important to the resolution of an entire class of future cases”
- rejecting mootness concerns since “the appellant-hospital (and the trial courts themselves
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Terry, Wagner, Pryor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Jung v. George Washington UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-05-26· cited 21×
- In Re JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-03-13· cited 7×
- Howard University v. Roberts-WilliamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-02-23· cited 6×
- In Re KatzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-03-15· cited 4×
- In re WylerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-06-21· cited 3×
- Paschall v. District of Columbia Department of HealthDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-04-07· cited 1×
- In re Johnny Taylor and Brandon ByrdDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2020-04-09
- In re MacklinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2022-12-22
- AFGE v. D.C. Water & SewerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2024-08-08
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court· 1975-01-14· cited 2,006×
- Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court· 1975-12-16· cited 1,702×
- United States v. EdwardsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1981-05-08· cited 205×
- Atchison v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-01-09· cited 44×
- Lynch v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-04-05· cited 42×
- In Re MorrisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1984-09-24· cited 38×
- In the Matter of LomaxDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-05-09· cited 34×
- McClain v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-01-09· cited 24×
- Williams v. MeredithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-10-02· cited 22×
- In re DeLoatchDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-11-05· cited 19×
- District of Columbia v. FaisonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1971-06-29· cited 18×
- United States v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1975-01-30· cited 18×
- In re W.L.D.C. Circuit· 1991-11-20· cited 18×
- Matter of RosellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-09-02· cited 14×
- Matter of ReedDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-03-16· cited 13×
- In Re FeensterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-07-20· cited 11×
- Matter of HermanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-01-29· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.