In Re Baker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• exempt fund or property which is not “regular income” is not to be considered in calculation of disposable income in Chapter 13 matters
• exempt proceeds of property which is not “regular income” is not to be considered in calculation of disposable income in chapter 13 matters
• exempt funds or property which is not “regular income” is not considered in calculation of disposable income in chapter 13 matters

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Coop v. Frederickson (In Re Frederickson)
  Eighth Circuit· 2007-09-24· cited 55×
• Gaertner v. Claude (In Re Claude)
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 1997-03-25· cited 31×
• In Re Ferretti
  S.D. Florida· 1996-09-10· cited 19×
• In Re Launza
  N.D. Texas· 2005-06-01· cited 12×
• In Re Tolliver
  M.D. Florida· 2000-12-12· cited 12×
• In Re Hunton
  N.D. Georgia· 2000-10-11· cited 9×
• In re Shepherd
  N.D. Indiana· 2013-03-28· cited 8×
• In Re Neclerio
  S.D. Florida· 2008-08-20· cited 4×
• In re Sjogren
  D. Massachusetts· 2017-07-12· cited 2×
• In Re Krapf
  D. South Carolina· 2006-11-20· cited 1×
• David D. Coop v. Craig M. Frederickson
  Eighth Circuit· 2007-09-24

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hagel v. Drummond (In Re Hagel)
  Ninth Circuit· 1995-07-28· cited 80×
• In Re Tomasso
  S.D. California· 1989-03-29· cited 28×
• In Re Hagel
  D. Montana· 1994-08-31· cited 21×
• In Re Stones
  S.D. California· 1993-08-23· cited 10×