E.D. California· 1/30/2002
In Re Avery
Citations
- 272 B.R. 718
- 2002 Bankr. LEXIS 109
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that although the proof of claim was “silent about the amount and classification of the claim,” the attachments “made up for this paucity of detail and dispelled any doubt” about the debt’s nature
- explaining what might motivate a 13 debtor to file a proof of claim on behalf of a creditor
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Michael S. McManus
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Smyth v. City of OaklandNinth Circuit· 2008-03-26· cited 17×
- Miller v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co. (In Re Laskowski)N.D. Indiana· 2008-02-27· cited 11×
- In Re EstradaE.D. California· 2005-03-07· cited 4×
- In Re GreenD. Nevada· 2005-02-18· cited 2×
- In Re DedmonE.D. Arkansas· 2007-03-15· cited 2×
- In re Lynn-WeaverD. Massachusetts· 2011-11-28· cited 2×
- Tremaine v. MillerNinth Circuit· 2005-01-28
- Dedre Feyijinmi v. State of Maryland Central Collection UnitFourth Circuit· 2024-06-28
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In the Matter of Gerald Lewis Tarnow, Debtor. Appeal of Commodity Credit CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1984-12-03· cited 187×
- In the Matter of Evelyn G. Escobedo, Debtor-AppellantSeventh Circuit· 1994-06-22· cited 59×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1985-07-17· cited 52×
- In the Matter of Ulyssus George Wade, Joyce Wade, and U.G. Wade Trucking, Inc., Debtors-AppellantsSeventh Circuit· 1993-05-21· cited 52×
- Ledlin v. United States (In Re Tomlan)E.D. Washington· 1989-07-05· cited 42×
- Bisch v. United States (In Re Bisch)Ninth Circuit· 1993-10-13· cited 28×
- Cisneros v. United States (In re Cisneros)Ninth Circuit· 1993-06-08· cited 28×
- In Re RiveraC.D. California· 1995-01-31· cited 16×
- In Re DelmonteE.D. Texas· 1999-07-08· cited 15×
- In Re RollinsE.D. California· 1994-09-06· cited 14×
- Ground Systems, Inc. v. Albert (In Re Ground Systems, Inc.)Ninth Circuit· 1997-09-30· cited 12×
- Matter of CarrD. Nebraska· 1993-09-14· cited 12×
- Matter of EscobedoN.D. Indiana· 1993-02-11· cited 10×
- Meadowbrook Estates v. McElvany, Inc. (In Re Meadowbrook Estates)E.D. California· 2000-03-31· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.