C.D. California· 12/1/2005
In Re Artimm, SrL
Citations
- 335 B.R. 149
- 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 2390
- 45 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 208
- 2005 WL 3334520
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- analyzing under § 304(c) of the old Code but noting that analysis would be “essentially the same” under § 1521(b) of the current Code
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Samuel L. Bufford
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re Atlas Shipping A/SS.D. New York· 2009-04-27· cited 67×
- Ad Hoc Group of Vitro Noteholders v. Vitro S.A.B. De C.V.Fifth Circuit· 2012-11-28· cited 62×
- CT Investment Management Co. v. Cozumel Caribe, S.A. de C.V. (In re Cozumel Caribe, S.A. de C.V.)S.D. New York· 2012-11-14· cited 24×
- SNP Boat Service S.A. v. Hotel Le St. JamesS.D. Florida· 2012-04-18· cited 14×
- In re B.C.I. Finances Pty Ltd.S.D. New York· 2018-04-24· cited 12×
- In re Agrokor D.D.S.D. New York· 2018-10-24· cited 12×
- Vitro, S.A.B. de C.V. v. ACP Master, Ltd. (In re Vitro, S.A.B. de C.V.)N.D. Texas· 2011-06-24· cited 6×
- In re LeeD. Massachusetts· 2012-06-04· cited 4×
- In re Ennia Caribe Holding N.V.S.D. New York· 2019-01-29· cited 2×
- Vitro SAB de CV v. Ad Hoc Group of Vitro NoteholdFifth Circuit· 2012-11-28
- Ad Hoc Grp of Vitro Noteholder v. Vitro SAB de CVFifth Circuit· 2012-11-28
- Fintech Investments, Limited v. Ad Hoc Group of ViFifth Circuit· 2012-12-14
- Vitro SAB de CV v. Ad Hoc Group of Vitro NoteholdFifth Circuit· 2012-12-14
- Ad Hoc Grp of Vitro Noteholder v. Vitro SAB de CVFifth Circuit· 2012-12-14
- In Re Vitro, SAB De CVN.D. Texas· 2011-06-24
- Vitro SAB de CV v. Ad Hoc Group of Vitro NoteholdFifth Circuit· 2013-01-07
- Fintech Investments, Limited v. Ad Hoc Group of ViFifth Circuit· 2013-01-07
- Ad Hoc Grp of Vitro Noteholder v. Vitro SAB de CVFifth Circuit· 2013-01-07
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1979-02-21· cited 3,653×
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 3,455×
- Vanston Bondholders Protective Committee v. GreenSupreme Court· 1947-01-13· cited 728×
- Raleigh v. Illinois Department of RevenueSupreme Court· 2000-05-30· cited 554×
- Jp Morgan Chase Bank v. Altos Hornos De Mexico, S.A. De C v. Docket No. 04-0450-CvSecond Circuit· 2005-06-22· cited 277×
- Cunard Steamship Company Limited v. Salen Reefer Services Ab, United Brands Company, GarnisheeSecond Circuit· 1985-09-19· cited 199×
- Canada Southern Railway Co. v. GebhardSupreme Court· 1883-12-17· cited 189×
- In Re: Koreag, Controle Et Revision S.A.Second Circuit· 1992-04-09· cited 136×
- In Re William Neil Simon, Debtor. Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation, Limited v. William Neil SimonNinth Circuit· 1998-08-27· cited 98×
- Finanz Ag Zurich v. Banco Economico S.A.Second Circuit· 1999-10-07· cited 80×
- Matter of CulmerS.D. New York· 1982-12-17· cited 80×
- In Re Axona International Credit & Commerce Ltd.S.D. New York· 1988-08-11· cited 58×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1995-07-12· cited 54×
- Petition of BrierleyS.D. New York· 1992-08-04· cited 51×
- Unnamed caseFirst Circuit· 1997-04-24· cited 50×
- In Re Axona International Credit & Commerce Ltd.S.D. New York· 1990-05-22· cited 34×
- A.P. Esteve Sales, Inc. v. Manning (In Re Manning)Ninth Circuit· 1999-07-01· cited 29×
- In Re LinesS.D. New York· 1988-01-15· cited 28×
- Bank of New York v. Treco (In re Treco)Second Circuit· 2001-02-14· cited 24×
- Interpool, Ltd. v. Certain Freights of the M/V Venture Star (In Re Dunn)D. New Jersey· 1988-10-11· cited 16×
Other cases named In Re Artimm, SrL
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.