Skip to main content
· 7/1/1999

A.P. Esteve Sales, Inc. v. Manning (In Re Manning)

Citations

  • 236 B.R. 14
  • 42 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 730
  • 1999 Bankr. LEXIS 857
  • 34 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 865
  • 1999 WL 528189

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Had Esteve been permitted to proceed to judgment, it could have improved its position vis-a-vis other unsecured creditors, thereby potentially disrupting the orderly reconciliation of claims and the fair distribution of assets in the British insolvency proceeding.
  • applying abuse of discretion review to 11 U.S.C. § 304

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ryan, Jones, Russell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.