In re Apple Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that joinder under § 299(a) requires the finding of “a ‘logical relationship’ between the claims linking the underlying facts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs
  Supreme Court· 1966-03-28· cited 13,852×
• Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.
  Supreme Court· 2013-12-03· cited 3,278×
• Cheney v. United States District Court for District of Columbia
  Supreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 1,878×
• In Re TS Tech USA Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2008-12-29· cited 352×
• In Re EMC Corporation
  Federal Circuit· 2012-05-04· cited 143×
• General Protecht Group, Inc. v. Leviton Manufacturing Co.
  Federal Circuit· 2011-09-26· cited 42×