Skip to main content
· 6/29/2018

In Re: Apex R.

Citations

  • 577 S.W.3d 181

Syllabus

This appeal arises from the termination of a father's parental rights. John C. and Kellee C. (\Petitioners\), uncle and aunt respectively of Apex R. (\the Child\), filed a petition in the Circuit Court for Knox County (\the Trial Court\) seeking to terminate Dustin R. (\Father\)'s parental rights to the Child. After a trial, the Trial Court entered an order terminating Father's parental rights on the grounds of willful failure to visit and support. The Trial Court found also that termination of Father's parental rights is in the Child's best interest, all by clear and convincing evidence. Father appeals, arguing among other things that the Trial Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to decide the case under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (\the UCCJEA\) because the Juvenile Court for Jefferson County, Alabama (\the Alabama Court\) made the initial custody determination, the Child's mother remained in Alabama, and the Alabama Court never relinquished its exclusive and continuing jurisdiction. We hold that the Trial Court had subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate the termination petition. We hold further that grounds for termination were proven by clear and convincing evidence and that termination of Father's parental rights is in the Child's best interest. We affirm the judgment of the Trial Court.

Judges: Judge D. Michael Swiney, C.J.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.