Court of Appeals of Kansas· 7/2/1998
In re A.P.
Citations
- 25 Kan. App. 2d 268
- 961 P.2d 706
- 1998 Kan. App. LEXIS 72
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting a split of authority in the standard of review for denial of transfer to a tribal court
- noting a split of authority in the standard of review for denial of transfer to a tribal court
- reviewing a good cause determination for \substantial competent evidence to support the trial court's decision that good cause existed not to transfer the case to the tribal court\
- finding that when the tribe was aware of the case and elected not to intervene, the failure to intervene could not be considered a declination of jurisdiction, but it could be used to support a finding of good cause not to transfer the case
- employing same standard of review to 25 U.S.C. § 1912(f)’s requirement of “beyond a reasonable doubt” as that used to review sufficiency of the evidence in a criminal case
- a failure to intervene cannot, by itself, be considered a declination of jurisdiction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Elliott, Marquardt, Wahl
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- A.D.T. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2008-12-26· cited 38×
- In The Interest of M.F.Supreme Court of Kansas· 2010-02-05· cited 38×
- In re Interest of Tavian B.Nebraska Supreme Court· 2016-02-19· cited 29×
- People ex rel. S.R.M.Colorado Court of Appeals· 2006-11-30· cited 26×
- In re S.M.H.Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2005-01-14· cited 25×
- In the Interest of D.M.South Dakota Supreme Court· 2004-07-28· cited 16×
- Tyrus H. Thompson and Ja'Ree C. Thompson v. Fairfax County Department of Family ServicesCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2013-09-10· cited 16×
- People ex rel. T.I.South Dakota Supreme Court· 2005-12-21· cited 13×
- In the Interest of M.F.Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2009-05-01· cited 11×
- In Re the Guardianship of J.C.D.South Dakota Supreme Court· 2004-08-25· cited 10×
- Timmons v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2010-05-12· cited 7×
- Nancy J. Martin, as Guardian ad litem v. Fairfax County Department of Family ServicesCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2013-09-10
- Minh-Sang Nguyen v. Fairfax County Department of Family ServicesCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2013-09-10
- Jasmine Vanderplas v. Fairfax County Department of Family ServicesCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2013-09-10
- In Re APCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1998-07-02
- In Re MfSupreme Court of Kansas· 2010-02-05
- In the Interest of CdCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2008-12-26
- In Re MFCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2009-05-01
- People Ex Rel. SrmColorado Court of Appeals· 2006-11-30
- In Re SMHCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2005-01-14
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court· 1989-04-03· cited 1,403×
- In Re the Adoption of Baby Boy L.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1982-04-03· cited 160×
- In The Interest of S.M.Q.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1990-07-19· cited 60×
- In Re the Guardianship of Q.G.M.Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1991-03-26· cited 49×
- In Re the Adoption of RiffleMontana Supreme Court· 1995-09-13· cited 40×
- In Re the Custody of S.E.G.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-08-31· cited 40×
- Matter of Baby Boy DoeIdaho Supreme Court· 1995-08-25· cited 39×
- People in Interest of P.B.South Dakota Supreme Court· 1985-07-17· cited 38×
- People ex rel. J.L.P.Colorado Court of Appeals· 1994-02-10· cited 37×
- Matter of Adoption of RiffleMontana Supreme Court· 1996-07-30· cited 36×
- Justice v. Board of Wyandotte County Comm'rsCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1992-06-03· cited 16×
- People in Interest of CAJColorado Court of Appeals· 1985-09-26· cited 15×
- In re J.W.S.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1992-01-17· cited 15×
- In Re the Custody of S.E.G.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1993-11-16· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.