In re Interest of Tavian B.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the Teague standard determines what constitutes a \new right\ under § 2255(f)(3)
• explaining that “it seems unlikely that Congress meant to trigger the development of a new body of law that distinguishes rights that are ‘newly recognized’ from rights that are recognized in [a] ‘new rule’ under established retroactivity jurisprudence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).