M.D. Pennsylvania· 5/26/1978
In re Anthracite Coal Antitrust Litigation
Citations
- 78 F.R.D. 709
- 26 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 744
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that joinder of 141 members would not be impracticable
- “The [141] potential class members ... are all in one state. Informal coordination of their efforts would not be difficult.”
- state-plaintiff satisfied requirement that it be personally affected and harmed by defendant in same manner as proposed class but did not satisfy other requirements for class certification, such as common questions of law and fact
- state-plaintiff satisfied requirement that it be personally affected and harmed by defendant in same manner as proposed class but did not satisfy other requirements for class certification, such as common questions of law and fact
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Muir
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 2002-09-05· cited 138×
- Liberty Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Marketing Corp.D. New Jersey· 1993-05-14· cited 85×
- In re Linerboard Antitrust LitigationE.D. Pennsylvania· 2001-09-04· cited 57×
- Masquat v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 2008-07-01· cited 43×
- Ouellette v. International Paper Co.D. Vermont· 1980-04-24· cited 29×
- In Re Commonwealth Oil/Tesoro Petroleum Securities LitigationW.D. Texas· 1979-07-26· cited 20×
- Christiana Mortgage Corp. v. Delaware Mortgage Bankers Ass'nD. Delaware· 1991-04-24· cited 18×
- Ardrey v. Federal Kemper InsuranceE.D. Pennsylvania· 1992-03-06· cited 14×
- Wagner v. Central Louisiana Electric Co.E.D. Louisiana· 1983-08-26· cited 11×
- Township of Susquehanna v. H & M, Inc.M.D. Pennsylvania· 1983-07-14· cited 9×
- Lubin v. Farmers Group, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2005-01-21· cited 7×
- MacNeal v. Columbine Exploration Corp.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1988-12-01· cited 3×
- Winoff Industries, Inc. v. Stone Container Corp.Third Circuit· 2002-09-05· cited 1×
- Unnamed caseTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2005-01-21
- Unnamed caseTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2005-01-21
- In Re LinerboardThird Circuit· 2002-09-05
Cites
41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court· 1971-05-03· cited 2,250×
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court· 1943-01-04· cited 1,730×
- Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court· 1975-10-06· cited 1,044×
- Reuben J. Katz, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Carte Blanche CorporationThird Circuit· 1974-04-09· cited 637×
- 12 Fair empl.prac.cas. 451, 11 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,741 John Senter, Cross-Appellee v. General Motors Corporation, Cross-AppellantSixth Circuit· 1976-03-01· cited 628×
- Cantor v. Detroit Edison Co.Supreme Court· 1976-07-06· cited 383×
- Joseph B. KAUFFMAN Et Al. v. the DREYFUS FUND, INC., Et Al., Investors Diversified Services, Inc., Et Al., AppellantsThird Circuit· 1970-10-20· cited 262×
- Garner v. First American Life InsuranceSupreme Court· 1971-03-22· cited 255×
- Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Anaconda American Brass Co.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1968-01-23· cited 207×
- Marceline M. DONALDSON and Others Similarly Situated, Appellant, v. the PILLSBURY COMPANY Et Al., AppelleesEighth Circuit· 1977-05-09· cited 203×
- Berni v. LeonardSupreme Court· 1973-11-19· cited 185×
- Windham v. American Brands, Inc.Fourth Circuit· 1977-10-11· cited 184×
- Demarco v. EdensSecond Circuit· 1968-03-07· cited 182×
- Mersay v. First Republic Corp. of AmericaS.D. New York· 1968-01-22· cited 172×
- In Re Master Key Antitrust LitigationSecond Circuit· 1975-12-22· cited 131×
- Richard Kline v. Coldwell, Banker & Co., RealtorsNinth Circuit· 1974-12-20· cited 106×
- State of Illinois v. Harper & Row Publishers, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 1969-04-25· cited 89×
- David Weinberger, on His Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Retail Credit CompanyFourth Circuit· 1974-05-29· cited 75×
- Chevalier v. Baird Savings Ass'nE.D. Pennsylvania· 1976-09-16· cited 75×
- James S. CAREY, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross Appellant, v. GREYHOUND BUS CO., INC., Et Al., Defendants-Appellants-Cross AppelleesFifth Circuit· 1974-09-26· cited 74×
Other cases named In re Anthracite Coal Antitrust Litigation
6 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- In re Anthracite Coal Antitrust LitigationM.D. Pennsylvania· 1978-09-29· cited 17×
- In re Anthracite Coal Antitrust LitigationM.D. Pennsylvania· 1979-03-23· cited 13×
- In re Anthracite Coal Antitrust LitigationM.D. Pennsylvania· 1979-01-23· cited 12×
- In Re Anthracite Coal Antitrust LitigationJudicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation· 1977-08-15· cited 9×
- In re Anthracite Coal Antitrust LitigationM.D. Pennsylvania· 1979-01-25· cited 8×
- In re Anthracite Coal Antitrust LitigationM.D. Pennsylvania· 1980-05-22· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.