Skip to main content

In re A.N.

Citations

  • 54 S.W.3d 487
  • 2001 Tex. App. LEXIS 5529

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \we reject the State's position that the adjudicated offense for which disposition is being modified may serve as one of the `previous' adjudications required under section 54.05[k].\
  • \We respectfully disagree with [Professor Dawson's] interpretation of the statute because it is contrary to the statute's plain meaning.\
  • “we reject the State’s position that the adjudicated offense for which disposition is being modified may serve as one of the ‘previous’ adjudications required under section 54.05[k].”
  • “We respectfully disagree with [Professor Dawson’s] interpretation of the statute because it is contrary to the statute’s plain meaning.”
  • \we reject the State's position that the adjudicated offense for which disposition is being modified may serve as one of the 'previous' adjudications required under section 54.05[k].\
  • “we reject the State’s position that the adjudicated offense for which disposition is being modified may serve as one of the ‘previous’ adjudications required under section 54.05[k].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dauphinot, Livingston, Walker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.