Court of Appeals of Texas· 8/16/2001
In re A.N.
Citations
- 54 S.W.3d 487
- 2001 Tex. App. LEXIS 5529
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \we reject the State's position that the adjudicated offense for which disposition is being modified may serve as one of the `previous' adjudications required under section 54.05[k].\
- \We respectfully disagree with [Professor Dawson's] interpretation of the statute because it is contrary to the statute's plain meaning.\
- “we reject the State’s position that the adjudicated offense for which disposition is being modified may serve as one of the ‘previous’ adjudications required under section 54.05[k].”
- “We respectfully disagree with [Professor Dawson’s] interpretation of the statute because it is contrary to the statute’s plain meaning.”
- \we reject the State's position that the adjudicated offense for which disposition is being modified may serve as one of the 'previous' adjudications required under section 54.05[k].\
- “we reject the State’s position that the adjudicated offense for which disposition is being modified may serve as one of the ‘previous’ adjudications required under section 54.05[k].”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dauphinot, Livingston, Walker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re A. I.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2002-02-28· cited 37×
- In re N.P.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2002-01-31· cited 11×
- In the of S.B.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2002-11-06· cited 7×
- In re E.C.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2006-09-27· cited 3×
- In Re AnCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2001-08-16
- In Re AITex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2002-02-28
- In Re SBTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2002-11-06
- In Re NPCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2002-03-28
- In Re ECTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2006-09-27
- in the Matter of A. I.Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2002-02-28
- in the Matter of C. E. T., a JuvenileTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2004-03-26
- in the Matter of C.S., a JuvenileTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2002-12-31
- in the Matter of T. B., a JuvenileTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2004-06-02
- Untitled Texas Attorney General OpinionTexas Attorney General Reports· 2008-07-02
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Helena Chemical Co. v. WilkinsTexas Supreme Court· 2001-04-26· cited 1,137×
- Fitzgerald v. Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 1999-08-26· cited 1,058×
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Garrison Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 1998-04-14· cited 450×
- Morrison v. ChanTexas Supreme Court· 1985-10-30· cited 357×
- Mitchell Energy Corp. v. AshworthTexas Supreme Court· 1997-04-18· cited 272×
- Tune v. Texas Department of Public SafetyTexas Supreme Court· 2000-08-24· cited 145×
- American Home Products Corp. v. ClarkTexas Supreme Court· 2000-12-21· cited 117×
- Steering Committees for the Cities Served by TXU Electric v. Public Utility CommissionTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2001-03-15· cited 53×
- Teleprofits of Texas, Inc. v. SharpCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1994-04-27· cited 23×
- Retama Development Corp. v. Texas Workforce CommissionTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1998-06-04· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.