In Re Amos

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The architecture of chapter 13 is essentially a bargain, allowing debtors to keep property only by agreeing to make some meaningful payment to creditors.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McKinney v. McKinney (In re McKinney)
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 2014-03-18· cited 15×
• In re Dolinak
  D. New Hampshire· 2013-06-28· cited 5×
• In Re Konowicz
  D. New Jersey· 2012-05-17· cited 4×
• In re Arenas
  D. Colorado· 2014-08-28· cited 4×
• In re Cobb
  D. Rhode Island· 2013-01-24· cited 3×

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Marrama v. Citizens Bank of Mass.
  Supreme Court· 2007-02-21· cited 843×
• Ransom v. FIA Card Services, N. A.
  Supreme Court· 2011-01-11· cited 410×
• Hamilton v. Lanning
  Supreme Court· 2010-06-07· cited 365×
• Maney v. Kagenveama
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-06-23· cited 131×
• In Re Farrar-Johnson
  N.D. Illinois· 2006-09-15· cited 105×
• In Re Barr
  M.D. North Carolina· 2006-04-05· cited 93×
• Ross-Tousey v. Neary
  Seventh Circuit· 2008-12-17· cited 78×
• In Re Randle
  N.D. Illinois· 2006-12-19· cited 53×
• In Re Austin
  D. Vermont· 2007-08-07· cited 37×
• Stapleton v. Mundy (In Re Mundy)
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 2007-03-01· cited 28×
• In Re Liverman
  D. New Jersey· 2008-03-05· cited 18×
• In Re Sandberg
  D. Kansas· 2010-07-19· cited 15×
• Coffin v. eCast Settlement Corp. (In Re Coffin)
  First Circuit· 2010-09-15· cited 10×
• In Re James
  D. Nebraska· 2007-11-30· cited 5×
• In Re Daniel-Sanders
  W.D. New York· 2009-12-30· cited 5×
• In Re Styles
  W.D. Virginia· 2008-11-21· cited 3×
• DeHart v. Smith (In Re Smith)
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 2010-09-28· cited 1×
• In Re Willems
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2011-02-03· cited 1×