In re A.M.

Citations

• 2021 Ohio 3691

Syllabus

When resolving parenting-time issues, the trial court did not err in refusing to allow or consider evidence of a history of domestic violence by appellee against appellant. The trial court did not err in considering testimony from the guardian ad litem. The trial court did not err in allowing appellee to be responsible for the parties' child during his parenting time when the child is at a musical performance scheduled by appellant. The trial court did not make facially inconsistent rulings or violate the doctrine of stare decisis. The trial court did not err in finding appellant in contempt while not finding appellee in contempt regarding alleged parenting-time violations. The trial court did not err in giving appellee decision-making rights with regard to their child's activities when appellee is exercising parenting time. Judgment affirmed.