Echols v. Echols
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 969
Syllabus
The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it overruled Mother's motion for a change of custody the evidence presented in support of the motion was insufficient to establish that a change of circumstances had occurred requiring modification of the existing custody order. The trial court also did not abuse its discretion when it did not hold Father in contempt for allegedly interfering with Mother's court-ordered visitation on Thanksgiving weekend 2017 and allegedly limiting her access to their youngest child while the child was attending daycare. The trial court did not err when it declined to add the parties' oldest daughter as a third party to the proceedings and to appoint her counsel, based on her statements that she wanted to live with Mother. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Donovan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- Davis v. FlickingerOhio Supreme Court· 1997-02-12· cited 1,567×
- State ex rel. Ventrone v. BirkelOhio Supreme Court· 1981-03-11· cited 292×
- Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. ReidOhio Supreme Court· 1999-04-07· cited 101×
- Nolan v. NolanOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-08-14· cited 28×
- O'Malley v. O'MalleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-11-27· cited 21×
- Corey v. CoreyOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-07-25· cited 19×
- Baxter v. BaxterOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-08-15· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.