In re A.L.
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 1767
Syllabus
The juvenile court did not err in applying the best interest test, rather than parental unsuitability test, as a father previously relinquished his exclusive right to custody of his daughter when he executed a \joint custody\ or shared custody agreement giving paternal grandmother legal custody of the child. Further, consideration of the best interest factors set forth in R.C. 3109.04(F)(1) demonstrates it is in the child's best interest for paternal grandmother to have legal custody, as the child's only form of stability has occurred in the two years she has resided in paternal grandmother's care.
Judges: Hendrickson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
- Miller v. MillerOhio Supreme Court· 1988-06-01· cited 1,173×
- In re MurrayOhio Supreme Court· 1990-07-03· cited 1,148×
- Perales v. NinoOhio Supreme Court· 1977-11-30· cited 446×
- Bechtol v. BechtolOhio Supreme Court· 1990-02-14· cited 384×
- Hockstok v. HockstokOhio Supreme Court· 2002-12-27· cited 210×
- Masitto v. MasittoOhio Supreme Court· 1986-02-05· cited 173×
- In re MullenOhio Supreme Court· 2011-07-12· cited 70×
- In re BonfieldOhio Supreme Court· 2002-12-13· cited 45×
- In re A.F.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-11-12· cited 7×
- Rowe v. RoweOhio Court of Appeals· 1950-10-03· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.