Skip to main content
· 11/22/2000

In Re Acceptance Insurance Co.

Citations

  • 33 S.W.3d 443
  • 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 7911
  • 2000 WL 1728427

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding mandamus proper to correct imposition of sanctions without notice and meaningful hearing in violation of due process
  • stating that the trial court had no authority to investigate whether the relator mediated in good faith
  • observing that the purpose of the ADR Act- is to “compel referral” of disputes
  • providing mandamus relief for void nunc pro tunc judgment entered after original judgment had become final
  • “A right expressly guarantied [sic] by the constitution ought not to be disallowed[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Day, Livingston, Gardner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.