· 11/22/2000
In Re Acceptance Insurance Co.
Citations
- 33 S.W.3d 443
- 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 7911
- 2000 WL 1728427
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding mandamus proper to correct imposition of sanctions without notice and meaningful hearing in violation of due process
- stating that the trial court had no authority to investigate whether the relator mediated in good faith
- observing that the purpose of the ADR Act- is to “compel referral” of disputes
- providing mandamus relief for void nunc pro tunc judgment entered after original judgment had become final
- “A right expressly guarantied [sic] by the constitution ought not to be disallowed[.]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Day, Livingston, Gardner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.