In re: AA.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating standard of review for court rules and that “[b]ecause [Hawai‘i Family Court Rules] Rule 24(a)(2)’s language is plain and unambiguous, effect must be given to its plain and obvious meaning” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Meyers v. Meyers.
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2022-08-25· cited 1×
• In re: AA
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2023-05-24
• In re: G.B. and K.M.
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2025-03-31
• In re: Guardianship of I.W. and T.E.
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2025-11-18
• In re: B.C. and O.C.
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2025-11-25
• Mālama Kakanilua v. Director of the Department of Public Works
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2026-03-12

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In the Interest of Doe
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2001-03-30· cited 181×
• State v. Wheeler
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2009-11-17· cited 164×
• Fisher v. Fisher
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2006-06-30· cited 133×
• Keliipuleole v. Wilson
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1997-06-10· cited 98×
• Amantiad v. Odum
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1999-05-20· cited 93×
• In the Interest of Doe
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1994-10-07· cited 63×
• Wong v. City and County of Honolulu
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1983-05-23· cited 60×
• Chen v. Mah.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2020-01-30· cited 41×
• Gap v. Puna Geothermal Venture
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2004-12-16· cited 37×
• Jack Endo Electric, Inc. v. Lear Siegler, Inc.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1978-10-31· cited 35×
• In the Interest of Doe
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2003-04-22· cited 27×
• In Re Doe
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2006-01-27· cited 8×
• Murphy v. Murphy
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1973-10-02· cited 5×