Skip to main content

I.M. v. State

Citations

  • 958 So. 2d 1014
  • 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 8666

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that victim’s opinion is sufficient if victim has personal knowledge of value; written estimates may suffice if they satisfy business record requirements or are uncontested
  • “[The witness] did not have personal knowledge of the value of the ruined items, but relied upon the opinions of his vendors, who did not testify.”
  • “[The witness] did not have personal knowledge of the value of the ruined items, but relied upon the opinions of his vendors, who did not testify.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barfield, Kahn, Padovano

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.