Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 11/13/1984

Illinois v. Washington

Citations

  • 469 U.S. 1022
  • 105 S. Ct. 442
  • 83 L. Ed. 2d 367
  • 53 U.S.L.W. 3363
  • 1984 U.S. LEXIS 413

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that because defense counsel served part-time as city prosecutor and the city was significantly involved in the arrest, counsel's professional commitments conflicted with counsel's role as appointed defense counsel in overlapping jurisdictions
  • White, J., dissenting, joined by Burger, C.J. and Rehnquist, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari
  • White, J., dissenting, joined by Burger, C.J. and Rehnquist, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari
  • three justices dissenting from denial of certiorari discuss the Illinois split and note that “numerous” federal courts have not limited Cuyler to cases of joint representation
  • three Justices, dissenting from denial of certiorari, note that “numerous federal courts have failed to discern in Cuyler any limitation to cases involving multiple representation of defendants,” and list these cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: White, Rehnquist

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.