Ideal Instruments, Inc. v. Rivard Instruments, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the court “cannot express its disappointment that it has been necessary to impose sanctions upon any party or attorney appearing before it”
• observing that it would be “hypertechnical and nonsensical” to conclude that local counsel has no responsibility for sanctionable filings that include local counsel’s name merely because local counsel did not physically sign the filings
• “Rule 11 says nothing about requiring service of the brief in support of a Rule 11 motion to trigger the twenty-one day ‘safe harbor.’ ”
• “The duty of a party to assess the viability of a claim is not measured solely at the time that the claim was filed, but is a continuing one”
• “The duty of a party to assess the viability of a claim is not measured solely at the time that the claim was filed, but is a continuing one.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Star Mark Management, Inc. v. Koon Chun Hing Kee Soy & Sauce Factory, Ltd.
  Second Circuit· 2012-06-13· cited 166×
• Ideal Instruments, Inc. v. Rivard Instruments, Inc.
  N.D. Iowa· 2007-08-10· cited 7×
• Robinson v. ALUTIQ-MELE, LLC
  S.D. Florida· 2009-04-06· cited 6×
• Ellis v. Beemiller, Inc.
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 2012-11-19· cited 5×
• Ideal Instruments, Inc. v. Rivard Instruments, Inc.
  N.D. Iowa· 2007-09-19· cited 4×

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1991-08-02· cited 6,250×
• Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1990-06-11· cited 4,510×
• Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.
  Eighth Circuit· 1981-01-07· cited 1,932×
• Pavelic & LeFlore v. Marvel Entertainment Group, Div. of Cadence Industries Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1990-02-20· cited 665×
• In Re: Clara Clark
  Eighth Circuit· 2000-08-21· cited 121×
• Chrysler Corporation v. John J. Carey Joseph P. Danis Carey & Danis, L.L.C.
  Eighth Circuit· 1999-08-05· cited 111×
• Patrick D. Kelly v. Marc Golden
  Eighth Circuit· 2004-01-21· cited 100×
• Perkins v. Spivey
  Eighth Circuit· 1990-07-24· cited 94×
• Harlan v. Lewis
  Eighth Circuit· 1993-01-12· cited 94×
• Monterey Development Corporation v. Lawyer's Title Insurance Corporation
  Eighth Circuit· 1993-09-01· cited 92×
• Lamb Engineering & Construction Company v. Nebraska Public Power District
  Eighth Circuit· 1997-02-18· cited 83×
• Stephen E. Jones Doyle Clark, Thomas R. Buchanan v. United Parcel Service, Inc. Local 41 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters
  Eighth Circuit· 2006-08-22· cited 83×
• Tylene J. Coonts, Larry Coonts, and Robert M. Sweere v. John Potts, Sr., Gary Koop, Vernon Johnson, Trampus Taylor, and Hobie Johnson
  Eighth Circuit· 2003-01-03· cited 75×
• Rhonda Tenkku v. Normandy Bank
  Eighth Circuit· 2003-12-16· cited 72×
• Gardenia Gordon v. Unifund Ccr Partners
  Eighth Circuit· 2003-10-10· cited 53×
• Intamin, Ltd. v. Magnetar Technologies, Corp. [Corrected Cover Sheet on 04/26/07]
  Federal Circuit· 2007-04-18· cited 47×
• Miller v. Bittner
  Eighth Circuit· 1993-01-19· cited 38×
• Willhite v. Collins
  Eighth Circuit· 2006-08-21· cited 35×
• Pamela Allen v. Tobacco Superstore, Inc. Hek, Inc.
  Eighth Circuit· 2007-02-02· cited 32×
• MHC Investment Co. v. Racom Corp.
  Eighth Circuit· 2003-03-17· cited 25×