Ninth Circuit· 3/4/1998
Idaho Sporting Congress v. Thomas
Citations
- 137 F.3d 1146
- 1998 WL 89066
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the standard for supplementing an EA is the same as for an EIS
- holding that an EA must be supplemented in the same manner as an EIS
- holding that an EA must be supplemented in the same manner as an EIS
- holding agency may not rely on expert opinion without disclosing hard data supporting opinion to the public.
- challenging decision to allow timber sale on grounds that Forest Service had allegedly failed, in contravention of forest plan, to monitor trout populations in streams affected by sale
- precluding the agency from relying on expert opinion in the absence of hard data
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fletcher, Scannlain, Schwarzer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerOther cases named Idaho Sporting Congress v. Thomas
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.