Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 3/4/1998

Idaho Sporting Congress v. Thomas

Citations

  • 137 F.3d 1146
  • 1998 WL 89066

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the standard for supplementing an EA is the same as for an EIS
  • holding that an EA must be supplemented in the same manner as an EIS
  • holding that an EA must be supplemented in the same manner as an EIS
  • holding agency may not rely on expert opinion without disclosing hard data supporting opinion to the public.
  • challenging decision to allow timber sale on grounds that Forest Service had allegedly failed, in contravention of forest plan, to monitor trout populations in streams affected by sale
  • precluding the agency from relying on expert opinion in the absence of hard data

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fletcher, Scannlain, Schwarzer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Other cases named Idaho Sporting Congress v. Thomas

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.