Klamath Siskiyou Wildlands Center v. Boody

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “an inconsistent factual or legal posi- tion is a threshold requirement of the doctrine” of judicial estoppel
• applying Paulsen in the context of Federal Land Pol- icy and Management Act and National Environmental Policy Act challenges
• applying Paulsen in the context of Federal Land Pol- icy and Management Act and National Environmental Policy Act challenges
• discussing connection between a parties’ final agency action challenge and the fact that NEPA is only 28 triggered for “major Federal actions”
• “[I]f the proposed action might significantly affect the quality of the environment, a supplemental EIS is required.”
• views of public must be adequately incorporated into process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).