I.B. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that special conditions of juvenile probation must be orally pronounced
• rejecting Sutton for the reasons stated in the concurring opinion, which concluded that Sutton “imposed a technical requirement beyond that required in any statute”
• rejecting Sutton as imposing a technical requirement beyond that required in any statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• MARK GORDON ANDERSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-10-18· cited 10×
• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-11-29· cited 8×
• Lyons v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-02-12· cited 4×
• D.G. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-03-02· cited 4×
• IB v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-02-06
• GRACE ANN KING v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2023-12-07

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Beasley
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1991-05-09· cited 167×
• Sutton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-04-22· cited 97×
• Brown v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-04-01· cited 32×
• B.H. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-12-02· cited 8×
• C.C.B. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-03-21· cited 7×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-10-18· cited 6×
• R.T.D. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-09-18· cited 6×
• Allen v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-01-21· cited 5×