C.C.B. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that similar provision did not have to be orally pronounced because it was in furtherance of rehabilitative component of statute
• holding that similar provision did not have to be orally pronounced because it was in furtherance of rehabilitative component of statute
• noting that section 790.23 made it unlawful for a person to possess any firearm if the person had been \convicted\ of a delinquent act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Menuto
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-05-04· cited 19×
• J.W.J. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-11-17· cited 13×
• I.B. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-02-06· cited 6×
• D.P.B. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-06-23· cited 4×
• JWJ v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-11-17
• DPB v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-06-23
• IB v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-02-06

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Beasley
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1991-05-09· cited 167×
• State v. Hart
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-02-22· cited 141×
• W.J. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-02-19· cited 15×
• A.B.C. v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-11-07· cited 11×
• K.F. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-11-08· cited 8×
• R.S. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-12-13· cited 3×
• J.H.L. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-09-17· cited 2×