Hyland v. State Bar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• attorney who represented himself because he could not afford counsel could not, after an adverse result, assert for the first time that counsel should have been appointed for him

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bradpiece v. State Bar
  California Supreme Court· 1974-02-06· cited 110×
• Yokozeki v. State Bar
  California Supreme Court· 1974-05-06· cited 93×
• In Re Fahey
  California Supreme Court· 1973-02-13· cited 81×
• Black v. State Bar
  California Supreme Court· 1972-07-25· cited 60×
• Clancy v. State Bar
  California Supreme Court· 1969-05-28· cited 36×
• Toll v. State Bar
  California Supreme Court· 1974-11-22· cited 35×
• Tomlinson v. State Bar
  California Supreme Court· 1975-02-24· cited 34×
• In Re Alkow
  California Supreme Court· 1966-07-11· cited 26×
• In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Holman
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1984-05-01· cited 25×
• Ballard v. State Bar
  California Supreme Court· 1983-12-27· cited 21×
• In Re Dedman
  California Supreme Court· 1976-06-22· cited 19×
• Slaten v. State Bar
  California Supreme Court· 1988-07-28· cited 15×
• Cooper v. State Bar
  California Supreme Court· 1987-09-10· cited 13×
• Haley v. State Bar
  California Supreme Court· 1963-09-19· cited 7×
• Oliver v. State Bar
  California Supreme Court· 1974-08-14· cited 5×
• Matter of Wade
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1991-07-03· cited 5×
• Lavin v. State Bar
  California Supreme Court· 1975-06-10· cited 3×