Skip to main content
· 5/1/1984

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Holman

Citations

  • 682 P.2d 243
  • 297 Or. 36
  • 1984 Ore. LEXIS 1288

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that heavy alcohol abuse and addiction to prescription drugs showed lack of appreciation of ethical violation necessary to support violation of ethical rule prohibiting conduct involving dishonesty
  • holding that heavy alcohol abuse and addiction to prescription drugs showed lack of appreciation of ethical violation necessary to support violation of ethical rule prohibiting conduct involving dishonesty
  • embezzlement without “deception in the sense of misleading the victim”
  • “The grouping of the noun ‘dishonesty’ with the other three nouns, ‘fraud, deceit or misrepresentation,’ might suggest that in order for conduct to involve dishonesty it must partake of some kind of deception in the sense of misleading the victim of the conduct. We do not so conclude.”
  • discussing intent element of former DR 1-102(A)(4)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.