Fourth Circuit· 12/5/1986

Hyatt v. Heckler

Citations

807 F.2d 376

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that “equitable tolling of the 60-day requirement is justified ‘where consistent with congressional intent and called for by the facts of the case.’”
recognizing “waiver of the exhaustion requirement and tolling of the period of limitations will rarely be appropriate”
explaining that “equitable tolling of the 60-day requirement is justified ‘where consistent with congressional intent and called for by the facts of the case.’”
explaining that “equitable tolling of the 60-day requirement is justified ‘where consistent with congressional intent and called for by the facts of the case.’”
relying on Bowen and approving equitable tolling under Section 405(g) where a “systematic, unpublished policy . . . denied benefits in disregard of the law”
applying the exception where the claimants would be “irreparably injured if the exhaustion requirement were enforced against them”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Butzner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

62 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Hyatt v. Heckler

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.