Jeffery Hines v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the ALJ improperly required objective evidence of claimant’s pain because Sickle Cell Disease does not produce such objective evidence
• holding that the ALJ improperly required objective evidence of claimant’s pain because Sickle Cell Disease does not produce such objective evidence
• holding that the “ALJ improperly refused to credit [the treating physician’s] medical opinion that his long term patient . . . was totally disabled”
• holding that the “ALJ improperly refused to credit [the treating physician’s] medical opinion that his long term patient . . . was totally disabled
• holding that an RFC implicitly contains a finding that claimant is able to work an eight-hour day
• holding that ALJ applied an “improper standard to disregard the treating physician’s opinion that [claimant] was fully disabled”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).