Hutnick v. ARI Mut. Ins. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a party cannot claim prejudice “where its own acts caused or significantly contributed to the claimed prejudice” (quoting Kor v. Nat’l Consumers Ins. Co., 706 A.2d 776, 780 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1998))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Stevens ex rel. Stevens v. Hickman Community Health Care Services, Inc.
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2013-11-25· cited 120×
• Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Cantone Research, Inc.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2012-06-27· cited 18×
• URS Group, Inc. v. Tetra Tech FW, Inc.
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2008-02-07· cited 9×
• Coast v. WITHUM SMITH & BROWN
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2010-05-19· cited 8×
• Christine Stevens ex rel. Mark Stevens v. Hickman Community Health Care Services, Inc. - CONCUR AND DISSENT
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2013-11-25