URS Group, Inc. v. Tetra Tech FW, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an offer conditioned on a release of all existing and future claims “imposed a nonmonetary condition that took [the] offer outside the scope of section 13-17-202”
• applying New Jersey law, based on a contractual choice of law provision, to contract claims, but applying Colorado law to tort claims
• “[W]e must next consider whether the judgment may nevertheless be affirmed on one of the alternative grounds . . . .”
• “[B]y requiring a release of all ‘future claims’ related to the project, TTFW imposed a nonmonetary condition that took its offer outside the scope of section 13-17-202.”
• The covenant “does not deal with good faith in the formation of a contract. Bad faith in negotiation [is] not within the scope” of Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 205.
• condition that plaintiff release \future claims\ was such a nonmonetary condition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).