Hurt v. Jones-Hurt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We have a ‘duty to interpret the several parts of a statute as a consistent and harmonious whole so as to effectuate the legislative goal.’” (quoting Colbert v. Commonwealth, 47 Va. App. 390, 395 (2006))
• “Rule 5A:20(e) requires that appellant’s argument include principles of law and authorities. The appellate court is not a depository in which the appellant may dump the burden of argument and research.” (internal quotations and citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).