Skip to main content
· 10/8/2010

Bandini v. Bandini

Citations

  • 935 N.E.2d 253
  • 2010 Ind. App. LEXIS 1858
  • 2010 WL 3937901

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a statement of wife’s counsel was not an unequivocal admission but was part of an argument that husband was aware of the decree and his waiver of retirement pay post-dated the decree

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robb, Vaidik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.