Missouri Court of Appeals· 6/29/2018
Hurst v. Hurst
Citations
- 553 S.W.3d 853
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[w]hen the trial court’s valuation of property is within the range of conflicting evidence of value offered at trial, the court acts within its discretion to resolve conflicts in evidence”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Richter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Taylor v. TaylorMissouri Court of Appeals· 2000-08-22· cited 49×
- Nelson v. NelsonMissouri Court of Appeals· 2006-07-11· cited 42×
- Wofford v. WoffordMissouri Court of Appeals· 1999-05-11· cited 22×
- Manning v. ManningMissouri Court of Appeals· 2009-08-04· cited 10×
- Coleman v. ColemanMissouri Court of Appeals· 2010-06-22· cited 10×
- Jamie Lee Kropf v. Mathew Adam JonesMissouri Court of Appeals· 2015-05-05· cited 10×
- Sullins v. SullinsMissouri Court of Appeals· 2014-01-21· cited 10×
- Cureau v. CureauMissouri Court of Appeals· 2017-03-28· cited 9×
- Plager v. PlagerMissouri Court of Appeals· 2014-03-18· cited 8×
- In re an Omega Brand: Double Up Queens or Better, Five Card Draw, Electronic Poker Machine, Serial No. 5265Missouri Court of Appeals· 1984-08-28· cited 6×
- Kratzer v. KratzerMissouri Court of Appeals· 2017-05-09· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.