Hurst v. Hurst
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 4006
Syllabus
Husband appeals decision of domestic relations court in divorce proceeding, which ordered division of marital property and debt and ordered Husband to pay a portion of Wife's attorney fees. Court did not err in ordering Husband to pay attorney fees. Husband's financial irresponsibility during pendency of divorce caused delay. Husband filed meritless spousal support motion and supported motion for a restraining order with misleading affidavit. Court did not err in ordering husband to pay interest on marital credit card where equal division of debt was equitable. Both husband and wife were financially irresponsible with respect to credit card. Court did not err in awarding Wife marital home but not granting Husband a credit for monies he paid toward principal. The parties stipulated that whoever received the marital home would not pay equity to other party.
Judges: Piper
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- Huffman v. Hair Surgeon, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 1985-08-09· cited 830×
- Williams v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-07-29· cited 36×
- Roberts v. RobertsOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-04-29· cited 21×
- Lykins v. LykinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-06-04· cited 15×
- Kraemer v. KraemerOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-09-24· cited 4×
- Smith v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-09-04· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.