Hurlbut v. Schillinger
Citations
- 130 U.S. 456
- 9 S. Ct. 584
- 32 L. Ed. 1011
- 1889 U.S. LEXIS 1768
Syllabus
<p>Reissued letters patent No. 4364, granted to John J. Schillinger, May 2, 1871, for an, “ improvement in concrete pavements,” on the surrender of original letters patent No. 105,599, granted to said Schillinger, July 19, 1870, were valid.</p> <p>The proper construction of the claims of the reissue stated, in view of a disclaimer filed March 1, 1875.</p> <p>The questions of utility, novelty and infringement' considered'.</p> <p>The entire profit made by the defendant from laying his pavement was given to the plaintiff, because it appeared that it.derived its entire value from the use of the plaintiff’s invention; that if it had not been laid in .that way it would not have been laid at all; and that the profit made by the defendant was a single profit derived from the construction of the pavement as an entirety.</p>
Judges: Blatchford
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.Supreme Court· 2002-05-28· cited 669×
- Schillinger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1894-11-19· cited 270×
- Altoona Publix Theatres, Inc. v. American Tri-Ergon Corp.Supreme Court· 1935-03-04· cited 256×
- Festo Corporation v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., Ltd., A/K/A Smc Corporation, and Smc Pneumatics, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2000-11-29· cited 196×
- Leesona Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1979-05-16· cited 105×
- Astrazeneca Ab v. Apotex Corp.Federal Circuit· 2015-04-07· cited 82×
- Crosby Steam Gage & Valve Co. v. Consolidated Safety Valve Co.Supreme Court· 1891-11-09· cited 69×
- Flat Slab Patents Co. v. TurnerEighth Circuit· 1922-11-18· cited 37×
- Wales v. Waterbury Mfg. Co.Second Circuit· 1900-02-28· cited 35×
- Warren v. KeepSupreme Court· 1894-12-03· cited 34×
- Brennan v. Dowagiac Mfg. Co.Sixth Circuit· 1908-06-18· cited 24×
- Richmond v. AtwoodFirst Circuit· 1892-09-27· cited 24×
- Stromberg Motor Devices Co. v. Zenith-Detroit Corp.Second Circuit· 1934-08-31· cited 23×
- Electric Pipe Line, Inc. v. Fluid Systems, IncorporatedSecond Circuit· 1957-12-30· cited 20×
- Metallic Rubber Tire Co. v. Hartford Rubber Works Co.Second Circuit· 1921-06-23· cited 20×
- Westinghouse v. New York Air Brake Co.Second Circuit· 1905-06-10· cited 19×
- State v. Local No. 8-6, Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International UnionSupreme Court of Missouri· 1958-09-29· cited 15×
- Carborundum Co. v. Electric Smelting & Aluminum Co.Third Circuit· 1913-03-15· cited 15×
- Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Wagner Electric & Mfg. Co.Eighth Circuit· 1909-08-16· cited 13×
- Dowagiac Mfg. Co. v. Deere & Webber Co.Eighth Circuit· 1922-09-11· cited 13×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.