Skip to main content
· 12/3/1894

Warren v. Keep

Citations

  • 155 U.S. 265
  • 15 S. Ct. 83
  • 39 L. Ed. 144
  • 1894 U.S. LEXIS 2271

Syllabus

<p>This court will not reversa the conclusions of the master, sustained by the court below, upon the extent of the infringement of a patent, when the evidence is conflicting, unless some obvious error or mistake is pointed out.</p> <p>Where a patent is for a particular part of an existing machine, it is necessary, in order to establish a claim for substantial damages for infringement, to show what portion of the profits is due to the particular invention secured by the patent in suit ; but when the patented invention is for a new article of manufacture, the patentee is entitled to damages arising from the manufacture and sale of the entire article.</p> <p>The defendants not having set up in the court below a claim for an allowance of manufacturer’s profits, or offered evidence by which it could be estimated, there is no foundation on which to base such a claim in this court.</p>

Judges: Shiras

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.