Court of Appeals of Georgia· 11/15/1972
Hunter v. State
Citations
- 194 S.E.2d 680
- 127 Ga. App. 664
- 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 991
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- search is not permissible as incident to arrest when it is not conducted in an area within the arrestee's immediate control, an area so contiguous that he might gain control of a weapon or destroy evidence
- search is not permissible as incident to arrest when it is not conducted in an area within the ar-restee’s immediate control, an area so contiguous that he might gain control of a weapon or destroy evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Deen, Eberhardt, Clark
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. WileySupreme Court of Missouri· 1975-04-14· cited 154×
- Meneghan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1974-06-24· cited 26×
- Underhill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1973-04-13· cited 21×
- Newman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1976-09-07· cited 19×
- Preyer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1979-04-17· cited 10×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-11-26· cited 7,454×
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court· 1970-10-12· cited 4,391×
- Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1964-03-23· cited 1,905×
- Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-02-20· cited 1,583×
- Clifton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1939-02-15· cited 93×
- Croker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1966-07-07· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.