Hunter v. Hunter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Where the case is one of fraud, the statute in no case will commence to run till the discovery of the fraud. … [Only when] a party is in possession of, or has notice of, the main fact constituting the fraud, the statute will commence ….”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Modine Manufacturing Company v. Carlock
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1974-05-13· cited 42×
• Branch v. Lambert
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1922-04-11· cited 34×
• Murphy v. DeFrance
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1891-04-15· cited 34×
• Anderson v. Dyer
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1970-06-26· cited 30×
• Kinne v. Webb
  Eighth Circuit· 1893-02-06· cited 27×
• Hudson v. Cahoon
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1906-02-22· cited 25×
• Tudor v. Tudor
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1981-05-26· cited 24×
• Sherwood v. Baker
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1891-04-15· cited 21×
• Burdett v. May
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1889-10-15· cited 19×
• Hancock v. Harper
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1877-09-15· cited 17×
• Adair v. Adair
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1883-10-15· cited 17×
• Newton v. Rebenack
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1901-12-17· cited 17×
• Zoll v. Carnahan
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1884-10-15· cited 15×
• Lewis v. Schwenn
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1887-10-15· cited 15×
• Faris v. Moore
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1914-03-24· cited 9×
• Downey v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1899-05-06· cited 6×
• Kinne v. Webb
  U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri· 1892-03-07· cited 6×
• Prewitt v. Prewitt
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1905-05-24· cited 5×
• Harper v. Eubank
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1888-10-30· cited 3×
• Ball v. Gibbs
  Eighth Circuit· 1941-04-09· cited 2×