Skip to main content

Hunter v. Hunter

Citations

  • 177 Conn. 327
  • 416 A.2d 1201
  • 1979 Conn. LEXIS 747

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[t]he presumption is that statutes affecting substantive rights are intended to operate prospectively, and to furnish a rule for future cases only, unless they contain language unequivocally and certainly embracing past transactions” [internal quotation marks omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cotter, Loiselle, Bogdanski, Peters, Parskey, Pabskey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.