Enfield Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. Bissell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no vested right to have claim adjudicated under previous version of statute governing deficiency judgments
• defendant did not have vested right to have his case adjudicated in accordance with statute as it existed at time of original adjudication
• “In Connecticut ... the judgment of a trial court [is] final, despite a pending appeal, when the issue [is] ... the applicability of the rules of res judicata.”
• statute explicitly directs application to pending appeals

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).