Hunt v. Up North Plastics, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “That the claims involve one or more common actors is, however, insufficient, without more to create a common nucleus of operative fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Schuster v. Anderson
  N.D. Iowa· 2005-07-12· cited 9×
• Pecore v. Jennie-O Turkey Store, Inc.
  D. Minnesota· 2014-01-07· cited 6×
• Hunt v. Up North Plastics, Inc.
  D. Minnesota· 1997-12-02· cited 4×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs
  Supreme Court· 1966-03-28· cited 13,852×
• Goulden v. Oliver Et Al.
  Supreme Court· 1979-06-04· cited 153×
• Unnamed case
  Third Circuit· 1995-01-19· cited 108×
• Joseph W. Hales v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.
  Fourth Circuit· 1974-07-12· cited 57×
• Nicol v. Imagematrix, Inc.
  E.D. Virginia· 1991-07-03· cited 56×
• Cochrane v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc.
  Eighth Circuit· 1979-01-05· cited 43×
• Salei v. Boardwalk Regency Corp.
  E.D. Michigan· 1996-01-23· cited 23×
• Blue Dane Simmental Corp. v. American Simmental Ass'n
  D. Nebraska· 1997-02-07· cited 12×
• Council of Unit Owners of the Wisp Condominium, Inc. v. Recreational Industries, Inc.
  D. Maryland· 1992-07-02· cited 10×
• Travelers Insurance v. Intraco, Inc.
  S.D. Iowa· 1995-10-10· cited 10×

Other cases named Hunt v. Up North Plastics, Inc.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Hunt v. Up North Plastics, Inc.
  D. Minnesota· 1997-10-24· cited 6×
• Hunt v. Up North Plastics, Inc.
  D. Minnesota· 1997-12-02· cited 4×