Hunt v. Tucker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• federal courts entertaining petitions for writs of habeas corpus must follow the state court’s interpretation of a state law absent a constitutional violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McArthur Breedlove v. Michael W. Moore
  Eleventh Circuit· 2002-01-17· cited 61×
• Davis Ex Rel. Davis v. Wallace
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 2002-07-03· cited 13×
• Fritz v. Colorado
  D. Colorado· 2002-09-16· cited 6×
• Overton v. Jones
  S.D. Florida· 2016-01-12· cited 4×
• Holland v. Tucker
  S.D. Florida· 2012-04-03· cited 4×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Estelle v. McGuire
  Supreme Court· 1991-12-04· cited 8,719×
• Pulley v. Harris
  Supreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 2,080×
• Bouie v. City of Columbia
  Supreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 1,779×
• Henry Lee McCoy v. Lansom Newsome, Warden
  Eleventh Circuit· 1992-01-29· cited 240×
• Hunt v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1994-01-12· cited 114×
• Ex Parte Hunt
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1994-04-21· cited 98×
• Ex Parte Allen
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1980-02-08· cited 45×
• Allen v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1979-11-20· cited 45×
• Lambert v. Wilcox County Com'n
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1993-06-25· cited 41×
• Britain v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1987-09-08· cited 21×
• Chandler v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1992-08-21· cited 20×
• Hunt v. Tucker
  N.D. Alabama· 1995-03-09· cited 15×
• Ex Parte Chandler
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1993-03-19· cited 11×