Ex Parte Chandler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• appellant was convicted of violations of the state ethics law and theft by deception; conviction on the theft charge was reversed, however, because the State failed to prove intent to commit a theft

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hunt v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1994-01-12· cited 114×
• Frazier v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1999-01-15· cited 50×
• Mason v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1998-03-06· cited 33×
• Dorsey v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2002-03-01· cited 23×
• Evans v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2000-09-29· cited 18×
• Hunt v. Tucker
  N.D. Alabama· 1995-03-09· cited 15×
• Langham v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1994-05-06· cited 11×
• Hunt v. Tucker
  Eleventh Circuit· 1996-08-29· cited 10×
• Lacy v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1995-07-28· cited 8×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Chandler v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1992-08-21· cited 20×