Skip to main content

Hunnicutt v. Myers

Citations

  • 171 P.3d 349
  • 343 Or. 387
  • 2007 Ore. LEXIS 870

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • caption may fail to comply with statutory requirements of ORS 250.035(2)(a) if it is “too vague and gives voters no clear picture of what is at stake”
  • caption may fail to comply with statu- tory requirements of ORS 250.035(2)(a) if it is “too vague 606 Conroy v. Rosenblum and gives voters no clear picture of what is at stake”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: De Muniz, Gillette, Durham, Balmer, Kistler, Linder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.