Hunnicutt v. Myers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• caption may fail to comply with statutory requirements of ORS 250.035(2)(a) if it is “too vague and gives voters no clear picture of what is at stake”
• caption may fail to comply with statu- tory requirements of ORS 250.035(2)(a) if it is “too vague 606 Conroy v. Rosenblum and gives voters no clear picture of what is at stake”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Hunnicutt v. Myers

20 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Hunnicutt v. Myers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2006-02-09· cited 6×
• Hunnicutt v. Myers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2002-04-11· cited 4×
• Hunnicutt v. Myers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2007-03-23· cited 3×
• Hunnicutt v. Myers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2002-02-07· cited 2×
• Hunnicutt v. Myers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1998-01-23· cited 2×
• Hunnicutt v. Myers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2006-02-09· cited 1×
• Hunnicutt v. Myers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2002-02-07· cited 1×
• Hunnicutt v. Myers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2006-02-09
• Hunnicutt v. Myers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2006-02-09
• Hunnicutt v. Myers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2002-04-26
• Hunnicutt v. Myers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2002-02-25
• Hunnicutt v. Myers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2002-02-14
• Hunnicutt v. Myers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2002-02-14
• Hunnicutt v. Myers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2002-02-14
• Hunnicutt v. Myers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2002-02-14
• Hunnicutt v. Myers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2002-02-07
• Hunnicutt v. Myers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2002-02-07
• Hunnicutt v. Myers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2002-02-07
• Hunnicutt v. Myers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2002-02-27
• Hunnicutt v. Myers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2002-04-26