Oregon Supreme Court· 11/8/2007
Hunnicutt v. Myers
Citations
- 171 P.3d 349
- 343 Or. 387
- 2007 Ore. LEXIS 870
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- caption may fail to comply with statutory requirements of ORS 250.035(2)(a) if it is “too vague and gives voters no clear picture of what is at stake”
- caption may fail to comply with statu- tory requirements of ORS 250.035(2)(a) if it is “too vague 606 Conroy v. Rosenblum and gives voters no clear picture of what is at stake”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: De Muniz, Gillette, Durham, Balmer, Kistler, Linder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.